State v. Oakley
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COZORT, Judge.
This appeal presents the question of whether a trial court can impose a more severe sentence at a resentencing hearing after an appeal than that sentence originally agreed to by the *274State, the defendant, and the court in a plea arrangement made when the case first came to trial. We affirm the trial court’s imposition of a more severe sentence.
The three issues raised by the defendant on appeal are: (1) that the imposition of the more severe sentence violated the constitutional guarantees against double jeopardy; (2) that the imposition of the more severe sentence was improper…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. OakleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983