Legal Opinion

Wheeler & Clevenger Oil Co. v. Washburn

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 2004No. 2001-SC-0271-DGPublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLER, Justice.

I. ISSUE

To secure credit with Appellant for his company, Appellee signed guaranty agreements contained on both the front and back of an “Application for Credit.” When Appellant sought enforcement of Appel-lee’s guaranties, Appellee claimed that his guaranties were invalid and unenforceable under KRS 371.065 because they did not specify a maximum amount of liability and a termination date. Did the failure to include those provisions in the guaranties render them invalid and unenforceable? Because KRS 371.065’s requirement that a guaranty contain such provisions does not apply…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bob Hook Chevrolet Isuzu, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Transportation CabinetKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Cinelli v. WardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. PlowmanKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  4. County of Harlan v. Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Executive Branch Ethics Commission v. StephensKentucky Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BakerKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Reece v. Dixie Warehouse and Cartage Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2006
  3. B.L. v. SchuhmannDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2019
  4. Wells Fargo Financial Leasing, Inc. v. GriffinDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. McBrideKentucky Supreme Court · 2009

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API