Raleigh v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HABPEB, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of robbery, and his punishment assessed at five years confinement in the penitentiary.
The State’s evidence would show that Walter Bobinson on the 23rd day of last December desired to go hunting, and carried with him two black dogs he claimed to own. That after getting to the hunting grounds he tied the dogs and was gathering wood to make a fire, having his gun in his left- hand. While so engaged appellant, Hanks Kasha and Carl Tatum drove up in a buggy, jumped out and accused Walter Bobinson of stealing the dogs of appellant. He denied it, and claimed the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Bittick v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- Fehr v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Patton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
3Cited by8 opinions
- McClellan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Curtis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Stone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Fullbright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.