Dimerling v. Dimerling

Opinion by

G-untheb, J.,

Plaintiff was granted a divorce on the ground of indignities. Defendant questions whether the evidence proved plaintiff to be “the innocent and injured spouse” and whether the evidence was sufficient upon which to base a decree of divorce.

The parties were married in December of 1951. The appellant was sixteen years of age at the time of her marriage and nineteen at the time of the master’s hearing. Pour months after marriage, plaintiff entered the armed forces and was in military service for two years. Shortly after plaintiff left for military service, appellant began…