State v. Stell
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ODOM; ’Justice.
S. J. Stell, H. W. Stell, and Tony Baronne were indicted by a grand jury, which indictment charged that they had committed certain misdemeanors denounced by Act No. 43 of 1942, known as the new Criminal Code.
Prior to arraignment they filed a motion to quash the indictment and challenged the grand jury array, on the grounds that the selection of the grand jury list and the drawing of the panel were illegal, null, and void, and that the grand jury was incompetent to return a true bill against them. This motion to quash was overruled, and a bill of exception was reserved.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. KelloggSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1892
- State v. BouvySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- State v. BussaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. RideauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962