Legal Opinion

Mackey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 9, 2017No. Case No. 5D17-133PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Tracey Mackey appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.850 motion. The claims raised in Mackey’s motion were facially insufficient. Rather than denying Mackey’s motion, the trial court should have allowed him sixty days to amend his motion. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(2) (“If the motion is insufficient on its face, and the motion is timely filed under this rule, the court shall enter a nonfinal, nonappealable order allowing the defendant 60 days to amend the motion.”).

We reverse the trial court’s summary denial order and remand for the trial court to provide Mackey sixty days to amend his…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tracey Mackey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. Michael Edward Norman v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
  3. Tracey Mackey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API