P2I LTD. v. FAVORED TECH USA CORPORATION, et al.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 P2I LTD., Case No. 23-cv-01690-AMO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 9 v. ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO TITLE
25 U.S.C. § 285
AND THE 10 FAVORED TECH USA CORPORATION, COURT’S INHERENT AUTHORITY et al., 11 Re: Dkt. No. 168 Defendants. 12 13 This is a patent dispute. Defendants Favored Tech USA Corporation, Jiangsu Favored 14 Nanotechnology Co., Ltd. (together, “Favored”), and GN Audio USA, Inc. (all together, 15 “Defendants”) prevailed on each of Plaintiff P2i, Ltd.’s (“P2i”) causes of action. Defendants’ 16 motion for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.