Hunter v. Richardson

G. B. Kinkead, for appellee, presented a petition for rehearing, to which

JUDGE WILLIAMS

delivered the following response :

The great misapprehension of the opinion, as heretofore delivered, and the known intelligence of appellants’ counsel, cause the court to distrust its powers of intelligible communication.

It is said in the opinion, that “ it was agreed in general terms between Richardson, Parker, and Moore, that the latter should become Parker’s indorser, reléase Richardson from liability, and thereupon he should be secured the same as Richardson ; but the exact manner of perfecting this…