Brian Gunnison v. Ingersoll Rand Retirement Savings Plan et al.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRIAN GUNNISON, No. 2:26-cv-0972 TLN AC PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 INGERSOLL RAND RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding in pro se in this action brought under the Employee Retirement 19 Income Security Act (“ERISA”). The case was accordingly referred to the undersigned for 20 pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). Defendants filed a motion to dismiss 21 for failure to timely exhaust remedies as required by the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Turner v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.