Legal Opinion

Adams v. Ward

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1881PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHardin, J.

This is a motion made to set aside or review taxation of costs. When the demurrer was decided, costs *289were awarded to the plaintiff. That was proper, though an issue of fact was left to be determined upon a trial (Sec. 3232 of Code of Civil Procedure; 76 N. Y., 314, Cambridge Valley R. R. agt. Lynch, decided in- 4th dept. and affirmed). That exercise of discretion cannot be reviewed upon this motion (Siemens agt. Veriane, 2 Lansing, 92; 14 Hun, 477, op. Hardin, J.).

The items for copies of documents “cannot be allowed without an affidavit that it or they were actually and necessarily used or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Doe v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  2. Tierney v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1879

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. de Turckheim v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Brassington v. RohrsNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
  3. Louis v. Empire State InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Maeder v. WexlerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904
  5. Doelger v. O'RourkeCity of New York Municipal Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API