Legal Opinion
IO I SYSTEMS, INC. v. City of Cleveland, Tex.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 18, 1980No. 17638PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, Justice.
I.O.I. Systems, Inc. (IOI) brought suit to recover $96,891.70 allegedly owed pursuant to a construction contract. IOI and the City of Cleveland, Texas (City) had entered into said contract for the construction of sanitary sewer improvements in Cleveland. Bayshore Engineers, Inc. (BEI) and C. Dieter Ufer (Ufer) designed the plans for this project and served in a supervisory capacity although they did not act as resident inspectors for the project. There was never any contract executed between BEI, Ufer and IOI.
For clarity, IOI’s cause of action must be divided into two parts: 1)…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Myers v. Gulf Coast Minerals Management Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1962
- AR Moyer, Inc. v. GrahamSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- City of San Antonio v. McKenzie Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
- Tower Contracting Company v. FloresTexas Supreme Court · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Bernard Johnson, Inc. v. Continental Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Eastern Steel Constructors, Inc. v. City of SalemWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
- Amco Energy, Inc. v. Tana Exploration Co. (In re Capco Energy Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Dukes v. Philip Johnson/Alan Ritchie Architects, P.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Federal Savings And Loan Insurance Corporation v. Texas Real Estate Counselors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.