King v. Cartee
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Error to the Common Pleas of Potter county. - This was an action of ejectment brought by John King, plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff below, against John L. Cartee, defendant in error, and defendant below, for one acre and three-fifths of land, situate in Coudersport, in said county. The writ was issued on the 7th of March, 1843, and returned, served.
Read the full summary
Error to the Common Pleas of Potter county. - This was an action of ejectment brought by John King, plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff below, against John L. Cartee, defendant in error, and defendant below, for one acre and three-fifths of land, situate in Coudersport, in said county. The writ was issued on the 7th of March, 1843, and returned, served. On the trial of the cause in the court below, the plaintiff having given in evidence the writ of eject, ment and return, offered in evidence the exemplification of a judgment from the record of the Court of Common Pleas of Lycoming county,…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Sergeant, J.
We are of opinion that there is no ground for the objection to the validity of the judgment of revival against Cartee and Taggart, entered on the 27th December, 1839, by A. V. Parsons, attorney for plaintiff, and M. Bliss, attorney for defendants, as Mr, Bliss was an attorney *154of the court, and undertook to appear’ and confess judgment for both defendants.
But we are of opinion that the sale of land in Potter county by the sheriff of Lycoming county, in 1840, after Potter county had been organized into a separate county, by virtue of the act…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- West's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1836