Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Whitmore

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1924No. 1053Published

1Opinion of the Court

Potter, Chief Justice.

Counsel who appeared as amicus curiae in this case, having formerly been counsel for the deceased administrator of the estate involved, has filed a petition for rehearing. As held by this court in Burns v. State, 25 Wyo. 491, 503, 173 Pac. 785, 786 “the petitioner, not being a party to the cause, and ashing to appear only as amicus curiae, is not entitled to file a petition for a rehearing, at least without the consent of the parties.” If such a consent would confer a right to file the petition, none is here shown, nor has any party to the cause filed a petition for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Church v. QuinerWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Hall v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Burns v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Barrett v. WhitmoreWyoming Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API