Legal Opinion

Magner v. Yore

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 10, 1907PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On quo warranto. Demurrer to plea.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Swayze, J.

We are satisfied that there has been no laches on the part of the relator, and the motion of the defendant to dismiss the proceedings must be denied, with costs.

We think the motion to strike out the plea ought not to prevail. Although there may he some doubt whether it is properly framed, we incline to the opinion that it may be looked at as a plea that the office was vacant at the time of Yore’s appointment, but we need not enlarge upon the subject since we think the plea is had in substance.

The plaintiff was chief of police of Bayonne,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
  2. State ex rel. Lane v. OtisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jersey City v. Dept. of Civil ServiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  2. Commonwealth v. RudmanAllegheny County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1946
  3. Hansen v. Van WinkleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  4. Kovalycsik v. City of GarfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API