Legal Opinion

Gould v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1972Published

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs claim that certain timber and timber-lands which they sold in April and May, 1965, were entitled to capital gains treatment under the Oregon taxing statutes. At the time of the sale ORS 316.408 *135was in effect and defined capital assets as “property held by the taxpayer (whether or not connected with Ms trade or business)” but excluded:

“(1) Stock in trade of the taxpayer or other property of a kind which would properly be included in the inventory of the taxpayer if on hand at the close of the tax year, or property held by the taxpayer primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gould v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API