Legal Opinion

Brennan v. Winnipesaukee Flagship Corp.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 11, 1982No. 81-081PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.

This is an appeal from the Meredith Zoning Board of *525Adjustment’s decision that the defendant Winnipesaukee Flagship Corporation’s (WFC) proposal to build a new home-port facility for a cruiseship on its property in Meredith constituted a permitted use under the town’s zoning ordinance.

The matter first came before the zoning board on an application for a variance by the defendant. The zoning board decided that no variance was required because the defendant’s proposed facility was an “outdoor recreational facility” and, therefore, was a permitted use under the zoning ordinance. The plaintiffs…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Win-Tasch Corp. v. Town of MerrimackSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  2. Trottier v. City of LebanonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Healey v. New Durham Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  2. Cormier v. Town of Danville Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  3. Lemm Development Corp. v. Town of BartlettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  4. Fifield Island v. Town of HamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  5. Cosseboom v. Town of EpsomSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API