Vasquez v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURNETT, Justice.
John Vasquez appeals his conviction of burglary of a habitation. After a jury trial, the jury assessed punishment, enhanced by two prior convictions, at forty years’ confinement. In three points of error, Vasquez argues that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, (2) the trial court erred when it found that he voluntarily and freely gave his consent to search, and (3) the trial court erred when it allowed the admission of evidence of extraneous offenses. We overrule Vasquez’s points of error and affirm the trial court’s judgment.
FACTS
At trial, the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Beardsley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- McDonald v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- McCullough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rosalez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
- Hood v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1993
- Blevins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Amy Dannette Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Little Joe Cordero v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.