Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Nioso

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 14, 2013No. 1D09-4767PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTION TO ENFORCE MANDATE

2Per curiam

In this appeal before us, Appellees North Florida Surgeons, P.A., and Dr. Gordon Polley have filed a “Motion to Enforce Mandate” requesting this court to require the trial court to deny Appellant’s motion to extend stay and set aside arbitration award filed in lower tribunal case number 16-2008-CA000130. Appellant did not respond to the motion. We treat this motion as a Petition for Writ of Prohibition. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.040(c) (providing that if “a party seeks an improper remedy, the cause shall be treated as if the proper remedy had been sought.”). For…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Torres v. JonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Basic Energy Corp. v. Hamilton CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Gardner v. NIOSODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morin Magloire and Germain Jean Claude v. The Bank of New YorkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. Casino Investment, Inc. v. Palm Springs Mile Associates, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API