Legal Opinion

Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Milauskas

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 5, 1976No. Appeal, No. 512 C.D. 1975PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

This is a direct administrative appeal by Betty Milauskas (Claimant) from a decision and order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirming a denial of benefits on the ground that her unemployment is due to leaving work because of a marital, filial, or other domestic obligation or circumstance.1

Since Claimant voluntarily terminated her employment due to filial obligations, we must agree with the *220Board that she is ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits. As Judge Wright wrote in Cochran Unemployment Compensation Case, 197 Pa.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crumbling v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Cochran Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. DollaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API