Richardson v. Hatch
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from a decree in chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Grey, who filed the following opinion: This is a motion to open the final decree in this case and allow the defendant, Hugh Hatch, against whom it was pronounced, to offer new testimony, and for a rehearing of the cause with such additional testimony under consideration.
Read the full summary
On appeal from a decree in chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Grey, who filed the following opinion: This is a motion to open the final decree in this case and allow the defendant, Hugh Hatch, against whom it was pronounced, to offer new testimony, and for a rehearing of the cause with such additional testimony under consideration. The bill of complaint was filed by Joseph P. Richardson, the administrator with the will annexed of' Joseph Hatch, a deceased partner, against Hugh Hatch, the surviving partner of the late firm of Hatch & Brother, and seeks a discovery and accounting regarding the…
1Per curiam
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Grey, rendered on the application for a rehearing and filed in the court below.
*794For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray—12. For reversal—None.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Cusano v. CusanoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Gulvin v. Sunshine Park, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
- St. Georges, C., Soc. v. Society of St. UrzuleNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
- Shore v. ShoreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951