Legal Opinion

City of Pittsburgh v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 7, 2012No. 100 C.D. 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEAVITT.

The City of Pittsburgh (Employer) petitions for review of an adjudication of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) denying its petition to suspend the disability compensation of Kenneth Mari-nack (Claimant). In doing so, the Board reversed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) that Claimant had voluntarily withdrawn from the workforce, as evidenced by his application for a disability pension and lack of effort to find a job. The Board held that Claimant’s application for a disability pension was irrelevant and that Employer, not Claimant, had…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sherrod v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. City of Pittsburgh v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Hackler v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ortiz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. K. Marinack v. WCAB (City of Pittsburgh Fire Bureau)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API