Legal Opinion
Haddock v. Springfield Yellow Cab Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided November 9, 1940No. 76PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEVIN, District Judge.
On May 24, 1940, plaintiff filed his bill of complaint herein. The action is premised on certain alleged acts of negligence.
On August 10, 1940, defendant, The Springfield Yellow Cab Company, filed a motion.“to strike certain words and phrases from complaint.” The cause is now before the court on this motion.
The motion contains five subparagraphs, numbered from 1 to 5, inclusive. In each subparagraph, respectively, the “words and phrases” which the defendant seeks to have stricken are set forth. Briefs in support of and contra the motion have been filed. The court has…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kraus v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
3Cited by3 opinions
- Plunkett v. Abraham Bros. Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Groves v. Paden City Glass Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1942
- Milstead v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023