Legal Opinion

Rappaport v. Otten

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1909PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by tk'e defendant, Peter Otten, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Mew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Mew York on the 21st day of September, 1909, appointing a receiver of the rents and profits issuing out of the premises mentioned in the complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlin, J.:

This action is brought to annul an agreement made between the plaintiff and the appellant on the 19th day of May, 1908, with respect to three parcels' of land described in the complaint, on the ground of fraud, and to have it canceled, and to have a mortgage, covering two of the parcels, bearing date the 16th day of October, 1907, declared void and canceled of. record. It appears that at the time the agreement was made the plaintiff was the owner in fee.of three parcels of land, known as Ho.. 173 Allen street, Mo. 38 Monroe street and Mo. 21 Hamilton street, in the borough of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. National Union Bank of Reading v. RigerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Congelton v. BeecherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jamestead Realty Corp. v. CohenNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Steppello v. VollNew York Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API