Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Gerald D. Norris v. The State of Georgia

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 24, 1975No. 73-2313Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWinter, Circuit Judge

With the majority, I agree that the record in this case discloses that Georgia and Louisiana have denied Norris’s right to a speedy trial, and that the district court correctly so decided and properly ordered North Carolina to disregard the detainers filed by those states. But I cannot agree that the district court lacked jurisdiction to order Georgia and Louisiana to give effect to that ruling and that it had jurisdiction only to require North Carolina to disregard, for North Carolina’s purposes, the two detainers. In my view, this result which the majority reaches is supported neither by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Ahrens v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Nelson v. GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API