Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jack Spring, Inc. v. Little

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1972No. 41730, 41739 consPublished

1DissentJustice Kluczynski

Initially, I would dispel any inference that a claim for rent due was involved in this combined appeal. The record discloses that the prayer for a rent judgment in the Little complaint was dismissed in the trial court and as specifically stated in the Little brief: “This case comes before the Supreme Court on appeal from a judgment and writ of restitution entered against Defendant tenant pursuant to a forcible detainer action for possession only of leased premises based solely upon an allegation of non-payment of rent due under an oral lease.” Nor was rent involved in the Price complaint.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rosewood Corp. v. FisherIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Schiro v. W. E. Gould & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Ingalls v. HobbsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  4. Rubens v. HillIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Bleck v. CosgroveAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API