Legal Opinion

City of Springfield v. Gillespie

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1929No. 19298. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DeYoung

The council of the city of Springfield passed an ordinance for the grading, curbing and paving of a portion of the east roadway of Noble avenue, in that city. A petition for the levy of a special assessment for the cost of the proposed improvement was filed in the county court of Sangamon county. Objections to the assessment were interposed by George B. Gillespie. His objections were overruled and the assessment was confirmed. Erom the judgment of confirmation Gillespie prosecutes this appeal.

Noble avenue, in the city of Springfield, is a street approximately 125 feet wide between property…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. BaerIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  2. West Chicago Street Railroad v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Chicago & Northern Pacific Railroad v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Village of Northbrook v. SterbaIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  5. City of Hillsboro v. GrasselIllinois Supreme Court · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Illinois Power & Light Corp. v. City of Centralia, Ill.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1935
  2. Village of Northbrook v. SteerupIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Kansas City Southern Railroad v. City of DeridderLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. The People v. Chicago Rys. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API