Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Snyder v. United Benefit Life Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1963No. Calendar 21, Docket 49,814Published

1ConcurrenceSouris, J.

Plaintiffs’ claim-is that their son applied for life insurance with de- ■ fendant, naming them as beneficiaries, and fully complied with all of defendant’s requirements for such insurance, including completion of the defendant’s application, payment of the initial premium and submission to a physical examination. Upon their son’s subsequent accidental death, plaintiffs claim as named beneficiaries the face amount of insurance for which he had applied, basing their claim on 2 alternative theories: (1) that an insurance contract between decedent and defendant became fully effective upon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Starr v. Mutual Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. CusickMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Wadsworth v. New York Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Bleam v. Sterling InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Brasier v. Benefit Association of Railway EmployeesMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API