Legal Opinion
Weill v. Weill
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 25, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by a judgment entered October 3, 2001, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Friedenberg, J.H.O.), entered September 8, 2003, as, after a hearing, denied his motion for upward modification of child support.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Where a party seeks to modify the child support provision contained in a prior order or judgment, he or she must demonstrate a substantial change in circumstances (see Domestic Relations Law…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brescia v. FittsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Love v. LoveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Weiss v. WeissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Rosenthal v. BuckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Cadwell v. CadwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fein v. GilchristAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Imperato v. ImperatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Radday v. McLoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Radday v. McLoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013