Legal Opinion · Dissent

Martinez v. Ulloa

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided September 25, 2015Published

1Dissent

Weston, J.R

(dissenting in part and voting to reverse the final judgment in the following memorandum). While I agree that tenants’ petition* should have been dismissed, I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that landlord is not entitled to a *49judgment of possession on its counterclaim. In my opinion, there is no authority to support the proposition that a party cannot be awarded possession on a counterclaim during a summary proceeding.

After tenants were issued repeated violations, which exposed landlord to financial penalties, landlord, in accordance with the lease, served tenants with a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Great Park Corp. v. GoldbergerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1964
  2. Haskell v. SuritaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1981
  3. 110-45 Queens Blvd. Garage, Inc. v. Park Briar Owners, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. All 4 Sports & Fitness, Inc. v. Hamilton, Kane, Martin Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Ring v. Arts International, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API