Chinook Indian Nation v. Zinke
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 CHINOOK INDIAN NATION, et al., CASE NO. C17-5668 MJP 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES 12 v. 13 DEB HAALAND, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees. (Dkt. No. 17 170.) Having reviewed the Motion, the Response (Dkt. No. 177), and all supporting materials, 18 the Court GRANTS in part the Motion. 19 BACKGROUND 20 Plaintiff Chinook Indian Nation, an Indian Tribe, brought this action as the successor-in- 21 interest to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Jeffrey Meier v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Bay Area Peace Navy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Love v. ReillyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. RubinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.