Legal Opinion
King v. Holland
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided October 6, 1994No. 13-93-309-CVPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENNEDY, Justice.
We withdraw our opinion of August 18, 1994 and enter this opinion in its place. Deicer and Renda King sued David C. Holland and David C. Holland & Company, P.C., d/b/a Holland & Stephenson for legal malpractice. The court granted Holland’s motion for summary judgment based on statute of limitations against most of the Kings’ claims detailed below. The court then dismissed the ease for want of prosecution. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.
The Kings wanted to sell their farm to Wilhelm Degen, but minimize the tax consequences to themselves. The Kings…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Swilley v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Brownlee v. BrownleeTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Willis v. MaverickTexas Supreme Court · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Jimenez v. Transwestern Property Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
- Maida v. Fire Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Dueitt v. Arrowhead Lakes Property Owners, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
- Scoville v. Shaffer, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
- Darr v. Altman, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.