Piotrowski v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1DissentWahl, Justice
I respectfully dissent. While the enforcement of traffic laws in the border towns of Minnesota for the protection of the traveling public is of deep concern to this court and to the people of this state, the validity of the stop and arrest and thus of the evidence seized from Piotrowski depends, not on a longstanding agreement between the Fargo and Moorhead Police Departments, useful as that may be, but on the law as it exists as applied to the facts of this case.
The court of appeals, in Piotrowski v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 433 N.W.2d 124, 128-29 (Minn.App.1989), concluded that since…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State, Department of Public Safety v. JuncewskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.