Legal Opinion

Batista v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 20, 1996No. 95-3577PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

685 So.2d 20 (1996)

Ricardo BATISTA, Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 95-3577.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 20, 1996.

Rehearing Denied January 15, 1997.

Maria Brea Lipinski and John H. Lipinski, Hollywood, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Keith S. Kromash, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, LEVY and SHEVIN, JJ.

COPE, Judge.

Ricardo Batista appeals his conviction for burglary with an assault or battery. We affirm.

Defendant argues that the trial court should have granted a mistrial based on an objected-to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. Stephney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. Herrington v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. DixDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. Bush v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. Dombrowski v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  4. Geniz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  5. Cruzata v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API