Legal Opinion

James Phillip Erickson, D/B/A Wit's End v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 22, 1965No. 21533_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant complains of the action of the trial court in granting motion for summary judgment holding the appellant liable for cabaret taxes under §§ 4231(6) and 4232(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. It seems appropriate to state that a party opposing summary judgment may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials in his pleadings to avoid the granting of such a judgment otherwise justified. F.R.Civ. P. 56. 1

Our review of the record convinces us that the District Court reached the correct conclusion. Erickson v. United States, D.C., 228 F.Supp. 421 (1963). The judgment is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dressler v. MV SandpiperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  2. Erickson v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1963

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Smith Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. J. W. Scarboro, Jr., and Mrs. Nan C. Scarboro v. Universal C. I. T. Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  3. Harris v. Louisiana State Supreme CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1971
  4. Washington County Farm Bur. Co-Op. Assoc. v. B. & O. R. R.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Comptroller of the Treasury v. Burn Brae Dinner Theatre Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API