Branch, Sons & Co. v. DuBose
Supreme Court of Georgia
Continuance. New trial. Evidence. Estoppel. Guardian and ward. Sales. Factors. Before Judge Goudd. City-Court of Augusta. February Term, 1875. Susan DuBose and William W. Simpson, as guardian of Louisa T. and William V. DuBose, minors, brought assumpsit against Branch, Sons & Company on the following bill of particulars: “ Branch, Sons & Company, “1873. To Susan DuBose and William W. Simpson, guardian, Dr. “April 24th.
Read the full summary
Continuance. New trial. Evidence. Estoppel. Guardian and ward. Sales. Factors. Before Judge Goudd. City-Court of Augusta. February Term, 1875. Susan DuBose and William W. Simpson, as guardian of Louisa T. and William V. DuBose, minors, brought assumpsit against Branch, Sons & Company on the following bill of particulars: “ Branch, Sons & Company, “1873. To Susan DuBose and William W. Simpson, guardian, Dr. “April 24th. To net proceeds of twenty-one bales of cotton sold by you on our account,..............$984 82 Thé record discloses no pleas. The jury found for the plan-tiffs. The defendants…
1Opinion of the Court
Jackson, Judge.
Susan DuBose and William W. Simpson sued Branch, Sons & Company in the city court of Augusta, for the sum of $984 82. The jury found for plaintiffs. A motion was made for a new trial on various grounds. We think none of them good, and adopt the opinion of Judge Gould contained in the record, as our own, a syllabus of which 'will appear in the head-hotes furnished the reporter. We remark that we find no plea at all set out in the record. A copy of an amended plea appears in the motion for a new trial, and that, so far as this record discloses the pleadings, is the only plea…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Maynard v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Hervey v. RawsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895