Legal Opinion

Exceletech, Inc. v. Williams

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 16, 1991No. 90-1716PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

579 So.2d 850 (1991)

EXCELETECH, INC., Appellant,

v.

S.W. WILLIAMS, et al., Appellees.

No. 90-1716.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

May 16, 1991.

John R. Stump of Frith & Stump, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.

Robert J. Pleus, Jr., and Richard D. Connor, Jr., of Pleus, Adams & Spears, P.A., Orlando, for appellee S.W. Williams.

EN BANC OPINION

COBB, Judge.

Exceletech, Inc. contends that it was improperly impleaded as a party to proceedings supplementary and that the trial court erred in denying its motion to quash service of process upon it. We have jurisdiction of this appeal pursuant…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Advertects, Inc. v. Sawyer IndustriesSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  2. Ryan's Furniture Exchange, Inc. v. McNairSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  3. Wieczoreck v. H & H BUILDERS, INC.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
  4. Wieczoreck v. H & H BUILDERS, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Richard v. McNairSupreme Court of Florida · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fundamental Long Term Care Holdings, LLC v. Estate of Jackson ex rel. Jackson-PlattsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. Patterson v. VenneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Exceletech, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  4. Zureikat v. ShaibaniDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  5. Sverdahl v. Farmers & Merchants Sav. BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API