Johnson v. Hous. Auth. of Oakland
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtPollak, P. J.
*606The Housing Authority of the City of Oakland (housing authority), which administers a federally funded subsidized housing program for the City of Oakland, appeals a judgment and writ of administrative mandate directing it to vacate its decision terminating plaintiff Etta Mae Johnson from its program. The housing authority contends the trial court erred in finding that it violated Johnson's procedural due process rights in terminating her from the program. We agree and, accordingly, shall reverse the judgment.
Background
Statutory Background
Section 8 of the Housing and Community Development Act…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Frink v. ProdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Nozzi v. Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Edgecomb v. Housing Authority of Town of VernonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1993
- Carter v. Lynn Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harrington v. Housing Authority of Riverside CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
- Sales v. City and County of San Francisco CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2021