Legal Opinion

Paddock v. Church of St. Barnabas, Woodlawn & McLean Heights, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment in favor of plaintiffs unanimously reversed, on the law, and the complaint dismissed, with $50 costs to appellant. Absent from this record, although read most favorably to plaintiffs, is any evidence from which a jury could reasonably find negligent application of the wax, or that the floor became more slippery or otherwise dangerous, as a result of the wax being applied when the floor was dirty. “ The fact that a floor is slippery by reason of its smoothness or polish, in the absence of proof of negligent application of the wax or polish, does not give rise to a cause of action.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Salem Danish Lutheran ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Nelson v. Salem Danish Lutheran ChurchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  3. Elias v. HellerNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Iorio v. Rockland Light & Power Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Galler v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Gootman v. Village of HaverstrawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API