Legal Opinion · Dissent

Legawiec v. North American Company for Life & Health Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 16, 2007Published

1Dissent

Scudder, EJ, and Centra, J. (dissenting in part).

We respectfully dissent in part and would affirm the order of Supreme Court that, inter alia, granted the motion of defendant for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint. In our view, defendant met its burden of establishing as a matter of law that decedent misrepresented a material fact on his application for his life insurance policy (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). “An insured cannot remain silent while cognizant that his insurance application contains misleading or incorrect information”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Meagher v. Executive Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. North Atlantic Life Insurance of America v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Angione v. Rochester Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  5. Schmitt v. North American Co. for Life & Health InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API