Legal Opinion

Lowry v. Forest City Borough

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1909No. Appeal, No. 72PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No. 72, March T., 1909, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Susquehanna Co., Aug. T., 1908, No. 45, dissolving preliminary injunction in case of S. E. Lowry v. Forest City Borough et al. Motion to dissolve preliminary injunction. Little, P. J., filed the following opinion. The borough of Forest City, Susquehanna county, was incorporated August 25,1888, under the provisions of the general borough Act of April 3, 1851, P. L. 320, and its supplements.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 72, March T., 1909, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Susquehanna Co., Aug. T., 1908, No. 45, dissolving preliminary injunction in case of S. E. Lowry v. Forest City Borough et al. Motion to dissolve preliminary injunction. Little, P. J., filed the following opinion. The borough of Forest City, Susquehanna county, was incorporated August 25,1888, under the provisions of the general borough Act of April 3, 1851, P. L. 320, and its supplements. During the year 1900 proceedings were instituted by the borough of Forest City, under the provisions of the Act of April 20, 1874, P. L.…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal'by the plaintiff from an interlocutory decree dissolving a preliminary injunction. In view of the facts set forth in the findings and opinion of the learned judge below, and particularly the fact that after the injunction was granted an ordinance in due form was regularly passed whereby the prior action of council was ratified, we are not convinced that the court erred.

The decree is affirmed at the cost of the appellant.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Royse Independent School Dist. v. ReinhardtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Colwell v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Glover v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API