Raduga USA Corp. v. United States Department of State
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PARTIES’ CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ISSUING WRIT OF MANDAMUS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES CONSULATE
MOSKOWITZ, District Judge.
On May 14, 2004, Plaintiffs filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief and a writ in the nature of mandamus. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants have unlawfully withheld and unreasonably delayed Plaintiffs Romanavskiy and Yakove-leva’s visa applications. Pursuant to the Court’s scheduling order, the parties filed cross motions for summary judgment. In its moving papers, the government claimed that the United…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Clarke v. Securities Industry Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rosales v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Abdur-Rahman v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2010
- El Centro Regional Medical Center v. BlinkenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Kassem v. BlinkenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Mohamed v. PompeoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.