Legal Opinion

Tammen v. Schaefer

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 16, 1907PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from the District Court of Wichita County. Tried below before Hon. A. H. Carrigan.

1Opinion of the Court

CONNER, Chief Justice.

The record shows that defendant in error instituted this suit in the District Court of Archer County on the 23d day of September, 1903, to recover land described in his original petition as follows:

“One hundred acres of land out of the Harvey Cox survey, known as abstract number 67, certificate number 318, in the records of the General Land Office at Austin, Texas, patented April 23, 1875, by patent number 118, volume 15, with field notes as follows: beginning at a stake in the east line of the Lucian Thompson 1,476-acre survey and at the N. E. corner at a 400-acre tract…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stewart v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Borden v. HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1847
  3. Marx & Kempner v. Heidenheimer Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Parnell v. BarronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Southwest Nat. Bank of Dallas v. CatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Hosmer v. New York Buyers' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. San Antonio Drug Co. v. Red Cross PharmacyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Parnell v. BarronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API