Legal Opinion

State v. Buckingham

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 7, 1981No. 80-129PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

The defendant, Marjorie Buckingham, appeals from her conviction for negligent homicide pursuant to RSA 630:3. She alleges that the results of blood tests should have been excluded from evidence because the police failed to notify her of the results within forty-eight hours of their receipt by the police, as required by RSA 262-A:69-a. She also argues that there was insufficient evidence to support her conviction. Finally, she questions the authority of the superior court to suspend her right to operate a motor vehicle for a period of three years as part of her sentence. We affirm the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. KilukSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  3. State v. ScarlettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  4. State v. NoelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  5. State v. ThayerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ChaissonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  2. State v. TowleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
  3. State v. GoupilSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  4. State v. AhernSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  5. State v. PandelenaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API