State v. Buckingham
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.
The defendant, Marjorie Buckingham, appeals from her conviction for negligent homicide pursuant to RSA 630:3. She alleges that the results of blood tests should have been excluded from evidence because the police failed to notify her of the results within forty-eight hours of their receipt by the police, as required by RSA 262-A:69-a. She also argues that there was insufficient evidence to support her conviction. Finally, she questions the authority of the superior court to suspend her right to operate a motor vehicle for a period of three years as part of her sentence. We affirm the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. KilukSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- State v. ScarlettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- State v. NoelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- State v. ThayerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. ChaissonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- State v. TowleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- State v. GoupilSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- State v. AhernSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- State v. PandelenaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.