Legal Opinion

Kami & Sons, Inc. v. Pipe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 31, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered on or about May 6, 1996, which granted defendants’ motion to strike the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126, and order, same court and Justice, entered October 25, 1996, which, insofar as appeal-able, denied plaintiffs motion for renewal, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

*313Plaintiffs conclusory denial of defendants’ detailed factual presentation demonstrating plaintiffs willful failure to provide discovery, as directed in a conditional order of dismissal, was insufficient to raise a factual issue requiring a hearing, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Szigyarto v. SzigyartoNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Ramsco, Inc. v. RiozziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Doino v. MeltzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Perez v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sage Realty Corp. v. Proskauer Rose L. L. P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. AT&T Mobility Holdings B.V. v. Grupo Salinas TelecomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
  3. AT&T Mobility Holdings B.V. v. Grupo Salinas TelecomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API