Legal Opinion

Pope v. Filley

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri

Decided October 3, 1881PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCrary, C. J.,

in ruling upon objections to portions of depositions offered in evidence by the plaintiffs, said:

I have considered the objections to certain portions of the depositions of witnesses sworn on behalf of plaintiffs, and my conclusions may be stated generally as follows:

*661. As to shipment “from Glasgow.” This is not a condition precedent. If in anywise material it would be an independent covenant, not going to the whole consideration, and for a breach of which an action for damages would lie. But, in my judgment, it is not material. The purpose for which defendant made the contract…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. of America v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  2. Gaines Bros. & Co. v. Citizens' Bank of HenryettaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Yellow Poplar Lumber Co. v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1896
  4. Salmon v. Helena Box Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  5. Kaiser v. United Railways Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API