Legal Opinion
Koyo Seiko Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 15, 1995No. Court No. 90-06-00300; Court No. 90-06-00309PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Tsoucalas, Judge:
Plaintiffs Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. and Koyo Corporation of U.S.A., Inc. and defendant-intervenor The Timken Company *874(“Timken”) contest certain aspects of the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s (“Commerce”), redetermination on remand concerning Tapered Roller Bearings Four Inches or Less in Outside Diameter From Japan; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review (“Final Results”), 55 Fed. Reg. 22,369 (1990). These Final Results cover the period from April 1,1974 through July 31, 1980.
On May 10, 1994, the Court remanded, in part, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd. And Daewoo Electronics Corp. Of America, Inc., and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. And Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Goldstar Co., Ltd. And Goldstar Electronics International, Inc. v. International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Technical, Salaried and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers of America, Independent Radionic Workers of America and Industrial Union Department, Afl-Cio v. Zenith Electronics Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. And Koyo Corporation of U.S.A. v. The United States and the Timken CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Union Camp Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Sgl Carbon LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012