Temple, Barker & Co. v. Poyntz
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 21 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL FROM FLEMING CIRCUIT COURT. cited 7 Dana, 412; 3 B. Mon., 120, 115, 116; 1 Litt., 302; 1 Met., 454; 1 Rev. Stat., 554; 2 Met., 54; 2 Ves., jr., 187; 2 Daniel, 203; Hilliard, 19; 3 Story's Rep., 454; 2 Barn. Adi., 93; 11 Mees.
Read the full summary
CASE 21 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL FROM FLEMING CIRCUIT COURT. cited 7 Dana, 412; 3 B. Mon., 120, 115, 116; 1 Litt., 302; 1 Met., 454; 1 Rev. Stat., 554; 2 Met., 54; 2 Ves., jr., 187; 2 Daniel, 203; Hilliard, 19; 3 Story's Rep., 454; 2 Barn. Adi., 93; 11 Mees. Sy Weis., 531-3; 1 Hare, 647; 1 Pick., 164; 2 Sumn., 151; 3 Met., 401; 2 Strong, 630; 2 Dana, 406'; 5 B. Mon., 354. cited 1 Met., 450; 2 Met., 336, 457; 3 Met., 391; 5 B. Mon., 237; 4 Met., 32, 213, 319; 3' Sold., 478; Stan. Code, p. 67, note G; Pr. R., 221; 1 Rev. Stat., 556.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE ROBERTSON
delivered the opinion op the court:
In September, 1860, the appellant, William T. Howe, sold to J. G. Sously his retail stock of merchandise for $4,500; and in October, of the same year, he made to A. Burns an executory sale in writing of Ms farm for $13,000, and, as may be inferred, simultaneously delivered the possession to each of the vendees, neither of whom was his creditor. Most of the pro*277eeeds of these sales were soon appropriated, by assignments of some of the notes and otherwise, to the payment of creditors who are parties to this consolidated record.
In July, 1861, the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Thompson v. Heffner's executorsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1875
- Terrell v. CheathamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- J. M. Atherton Co. v. IvesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1884
- Whitehead v. WoodruffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1874
- King v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880