Bremen Mining & Milling Co. v. Bremen
New Mexico Supreme Court
Appeal from tbe district 'court of Grant county, before Erank W. Parker, Associate Justice. It is competent for the states to change the form of the remedy, or to modify it as they may see fit, provided no substantial right secured by the contract is thereby impaired.
Read the full summary
Appeal from tbe district 'court of Grant county, before Erank W. Parker, Associate Justice. It is competent for the states to change the form of the remedy, or to modify it as they may see fit, provided no substantial right secured by the contract is thereby impaired. United States v. Quincy, 4 Wall. 535; Cairo & Fulton R. I. Co. v. Hecht, 95 U. S. 188; Sturges v. Crowninshield, 4 Wheat, 122; Terry v. Anderson, 95 U. S. 628; Tennessee v. Sneed, 96; U. S. 69; Bronson v. Kinzie, 1-How. 311; Von Hoffman v. Quincy; 4 Wall. 535; Bruce v. Schuyler, 9 111. 221; Huntzinger v. Brock, 3 Grant, Cas.…
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT.
M’FIE, J.
— On the 2nd day of December, 1902, the Bremen Mining and Milling Company filed its bill in equity in which the above, among other facts, were alleged and it was further aleged:
“Plaintiff further states that the aforesaid propert}r was conveyed to said Allen upon the following trust; that is to say, for the benefit and better security of Martin W. Bremen, to whom said bonds were delivered, and the persons, respectively, who shall or may, from time to time, be or become the.holders of said bonds or any of them; that said mortgage deed of trust contains a power of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bronson v. KinzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. WylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Barnitz v. BeverlySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Scovill v. GlasnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Tennessee v. SneedSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hudson v. Herschbach Drilling Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
- Albright v. AlbrightNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
- Morris Ex Rel. Morris v. FitzgeraldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Honaker v. Ralph Pool's Albuquerque Auto Sales, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Hueston v. Preferred Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.