Legal Opinion

Piluso v. Piluso

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 28, 1993No. 93-0283PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DELL, Chief Judge.

Appellant has failed to demonstrate the trial court abused its discretion in either its award of temporary support or suit money. We reject appellant’s argument that Robbie v. Robbie, 591 So.2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA1991) requires reversal because the trial court failed to include in its order the specific findings on which the trial court based its award of temporary fees. In Robbie, this court said:

Specific findings regarding allowances for temporary or prospective fees are especially needed when one considers the limited scope of review under the abuse of discretion test.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robbie v. RobbieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rose v. RoseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. Aziz v. AzizDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  3. Sean Moore v. Teresa Kelso-MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. Van Maerssen v. GerdtsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  5. Amar v. KHAN-AMARDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API