Ames v. Kinneak
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Irwin, J., entered Kovember 16, 1904, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after sustaining a demurrer to an affirmative answer and a trial before the court without a jury, in an action for the specific performance of a subscription.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.
— This action involves a controversy over certain tide lands, situate near the head of Elliott bay. The facts alleged in the complaint necessary to be stated here are substantially as follows: On the 25th day of April, 1895, the defendants, together with one D. O. Brawlev, since deceased, executed the written instrument hereinafter set forth. Omitting the description of the lands mentioned therein, the said written instrument is as follows:
*84“This Indenture, made and entered into this 25th day of April, 1895, by and between George Kinnear and Angie Kinnear, his wife; W. R. Brawley and Gertrude…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jones v. HathawayIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Morrow v. HansonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
- Simpson Centenary College v. BryanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
- Jones v. BuffumIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
- Sorrells v. McHenrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Robbins v. Wilson Creek State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Bowyer v. Boss Tweed-Clipper Gold Mines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
- Ames v. KinnearWashington Supreme Court · 1907